While the question of man versus machine has been asked for over a century
now when it comes to all facets of business, each decade brings a different
perspective to the debate. While in the past the query revolved around the balance
of issues such as costs and labour, today the question is being put through
a new filter, that of the environment.
When it comes to the environment, we can look at the use of man or machine
under two different topics. The first is in our efforts to beautify the spaces
around us. Humans in all cities are concerned with the way their living spaces
are perceived, and modify their environments through various forms of landscaping.
Burlington, Toronto, Washington, and all other cities large and small employ
small armies for making sure their cities give a favourable impression to residents
and visitors alike.
And just as with real armies, those used to make the most of the spaces around
us combine both man and machine labour. While machines may be used to bring
about ideas in landscaping, it is the individual person who is responsible for
conceiving the idea as well as operating the machinery which provides the majority
of the work. From purchasing growers supplies to using those supplies to clean
up a municipal garden, man power is essential when it comes to beautifying our
environment.
When it comes to the task of keeping our larger environment healthy, however,
the answer to our question may tip slightly in favour of the machine. When it
comes to this side of the equation, we are usually talking about the use of
machine or man power when it comes to making sure industries reduce the amount
of pollution they put back out into our living spaces, and that means precise
control is needed.
That type of control can only really be provided by machines. Many industries
have strict limitations and regulations that must be observed when it comes
to the use of water in their plants. Not only is the appropriate amount of water
closely regulated, so is the way in which that water is treated. Water treatment
chemicals can best be monitored and controlled through automated systems, although
those systems in turn usually require some type of human observation.
Machines can also mean that many of the nastier parts of industrial cleanup
can be avoided by humans, thus ensuring a more complete job. Lagoon cleaning
and grease trap suction are good examples of jobs which most humans would prefer
to avoid, and which can be done in a more complete fashion by machines.
When it comes to the question of man versus machine from the environmental
perspective, then, the result is a tie. While landscaping efforts such as those
at the municipal level may favour human labour, deeper jobs at the industrial
level like those which must be done by a corrugated plastic box manufacturer
require the precision of machines. Thus, the important topic of our environment
is best addressed by both man and machine.
This web article is proudly sponsored by Moishe Alexander, Canadian Funding Corporation. We thank him for his generous support.
|